Map Picks and Bans
Do you know who will win next?
People who bet 100$ won 172$
Don’t miss your chance next time!
Player comparison
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52 |  SquEzxc | 1.1 | 32% | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 78.1 |
| 51 | dezl3bio | 1 | 47% | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 87.4 |
| 52 | tw1sterzaza | 1.1 | 48% | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 76 |
| 60 | pleynnn | 1.2 | 51% | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 88.9 |
| 48 | DAN9ARMATURA | 1.2 | 52% | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 73.6 |
Head to head
Previous matches
CYBERSHOKE Prospects
Young TigeRES
Info
Check CYBERSHOKE Prospects vs Young TigeRES full CS2 match result & analysis from CCT Europe 2026 Contenders #4, played as a BO3 series with CYBERSHOKE Prospects winning 2 : 0. Dive into map-by-map statistics: round scores, team economy, ADR leaders, K/D ratios, Headshot %, and player performances for key fraggers like pleynnn, tw1sterzaza, SquEzxc, DAN9ARMATURA, dezl3bio, seberya, Gashhhhi4, wh1teout, z3ndy, tronic.
Analyze Utility Damage, Entry Fragging success, and tactical breakdowns - which maps were played, how the T-Side and CT-Side influenced rounds, and the impact of the final Clutch plays. Compare performance trends like First Kill Advantage and round efficiency to see how CYBERSHOKE Prospects responded under pressure and where Young TigeRES outperformed them.
Use head-to-head (H2H) past results, team vs team history, and recent form to contextualize the result and understand momentum going forward. Ideal for fans, analysts, and bettors seeking match analytics, CS2 meta insights, map trends, and post-match breakdowns. Find replay links, match timeline visuals, and filter by map, player, and date to explore details.
