Intel Extreme Masters Beijing 2026
T1
BO3

Map Picks and Bans

Anubis
BAN
Anubis
PARIVISION
Inferno
PICK
Inferno
PARIVISION
Cache
BAN
Cache
Natus Vincere
Nuke
BAN
Nuke
PARIVISION
Dust2
BAN
Dust2
Natus Vincere
Mirage
PICK
Mirage
Natus Vincere
Ancient
DECIDER
Ancient

Do you know who will win next?

Player comparisonbased on the match

PARIVISION
Average
Player
70
Jame
1.315%0.20.60.20.560.1
62
HObbit
0.945%0.10.60.10.659.7
74
FL1T
0.939%0.20.70.30.778.8
74
xiELO
0.849%0.10.50.30.769.5
64
zweih
151%0.10.60.30.673.7
Player
79
b1t
1.150%0.10.60.20.670.5
74
iM
0.855%0.10.50.30.764
89
w0nderful
1.631%0.20.90.30.585.6
58
Aleksib
0.835%0.10.50.50.663.9
77
makazze
153%0.10.70.10.768.5

Head to headPast matches

Previous matches

PARIVISION

Natus Vincere

Info

Check PARIVISION vs Natus Vincere full CS2 match result & analysis from Intel Extreme Masters Beijing 2026, played as a BO3 series with Natus Vincere winning 2 : 1. Dive into map-by-map statistics: round scores, team economy, ADR leaders, K/D ratios, Headshot %, and player performances for key fraggers like Jame, FL1T, xiELO, HObbit, zweih, Aleksib, b1t, iM, w0nderful, makazze.

Analyze Utility Damage, Entry Fragging success, and tactical breakdowns - which maps were played, how the T-Side and CT-Side influenced rounds, and the impact of the final Clutch plays. Compare performance trends like First Kill Advantage and round efficiency to see how PARIVISION responded under pressure and where Natus Vincere outperformed them.

Use head-to-head (H2H) past results, team vs team history, and recent form to contextualize the result and understand momentum going forward. Ideal for fans, analysts, and bettors seeking match analytics, CS2 meta insights, map trends, and post-match breakdowns. Find replay links, match timeline visuals, and filter by map, player, and date to explore details.