CCT Season 2 Series 6
T2
BO3

Do you know who will win next?

Player comparisonbased on the match

PlayerHero healing / minKill participation
50
NandeSafe Lane
4.16396419.60.4462.70.149%
29
CopyMid Lane
35967388.90.2722.8066%
50
PalantimosOff Lane
4.64996256.20.3395.3075%
31
KidaroHard Support
22944961.40.2193.4167.358%
48
EkkiHard Support
2.83314871.20247.5078%
Runa Team
Average
PlayerHero healing / minKill participation
34
nesfeerSafe Lane
8.371889511.30.3800.462.574%
45
NICKY`COOLMid Lane
5.858974270.1570.596.276%
32
alberkaaaOff Lane
2.95276257.10.2316.9062%
37
queezySoft Support
5.13374461.70.14701.876%
36
Till the endSoft Support
3.13044631.40.1281.810773%

Head to headPast matches

Previous matches

Pipsqueak+4

Runa Team

Info

Check Pipsqueak+4 vs Runa Team full Dota 2 match result & analysis from CCT Season 2 Series 6, played as a BO3 series with Runa Team winning 2 : 1. Dive into game-by-game statistics: game scores, team net worth values, GPM/XPM leaders, kill/death/assist (K/D/A) ratios, and hero performances for players like Nande, Copy, Palantimos, Ekki, Kidaro, nesfeer, NICKY`COOL, alberkaaa, queezy, Till the end.

Analyze objective control, tower damage, Roshan influence, item builds and draft phases — which heroes were picked, banned, and which gave map control. Compare performance trends like kill participation rate, farm efficiency (LH/DN), gold per minute and experience per minute to see how Pipsqueak+4 responded under pressure and where Runa Team outperformed them.

Use head-to-head (H2H) past results, team vs team history, and recent form to contextualize the result and understand momentum going forward in the tournament. Ideal for fans, analysts, and bettors seeking match analytics, meta insights, hero trends, and post-match breakdowns. Find replay links, match timeline visuals, and filter by game, player, and date to explore details.