Do you know who will win next?

Player comparisonbased on the match

PlayTime
Average
PlayerHero healing / minKill participation
78
WitsSafe Lane
1167781390.4683.4059%
50
DarkmagoMid Lane
18.56948238.30.6609064%
33
FrankOff Lane
12.56266016.80.3572.3067%
87
elmishoSoft Support
8.137254020.1267.110454%
50
ScofieldHard Support
6.23055080.70.1297.70.460%
PlayerHero healing / minKill participation
50
K1Safe Lane
1.8672565130.2569.1057%
27
OscarSafe Lane
13884065.40.4477059%
35
PiPiMid Lane
1.44515717.50.2376059%
50
GenekSoft Support
1.42762651.50324078%
40
PandabooHard Support
0.82152580.80301.52.580%

Head to headPast matches

Previous matches

PlayTime

Amaru Gaming

Info

Check PlayTime vs Amaru Gaming full Dota 2 match result & analysis from The International 2026: South America Closed Qualifier, played as a BO3 series with PlayTime winning 2 : 0. Dive into game-by-game statistics: game scores, team net worth values, GPM/XPM leaders, kill/death/assist (K/D/A) ratios, and hero performances for players like Wits, Darkmago, Frank, elmisho, Scofield, K1, Oscar, PiPi, Genek, Pandaboo.

Analyze objective control, tower damage, Roshan influence, item builds and draft phases — which heroes were picked, banned, and which gave map control. Compare performance trends like kill participation rate, farm efficiency (LH/DN), gold per minute and experience per minute to see how PlayTime responded under pressure and where Amaru Gaming outperformed them.

Use head-to-head (H2H) past results, team vs team history, and recent form to contextualize the result and understand momentum going forward in the tournament. Ideal for fans, analysts, and bettors seeking match analytics, meta insights, hero trends, and post-match breakdowns. Find replay links, match timeline visuals, and filter by game, player, and date to explore details.