Do you know who will win next?

Player comparisonbased on the match

LGD Gaming
Average
PlayerHero healing / minKill participation
77
YumaSafe Lane
3.373584512.10.28230.551%
50
TaiLungMid Lane
6.569476711.10.2573.4154%
87
WisperOff Lane
4.66156789.10.2409.42.784%
72
ThiolicorSoft Support
2.53895942.40461.618.866%
75
KJHard Support
3.73355631.80.1389.969.643%
PlayTime
Average
PlayerHero healing / minKill participation
78
WitsSafe Lane
671874311.50.3605.864.566%
50
DarkmagoMid Lane
7.669685211.50.1585.50.268%
33
FrankOff Lane
6.65897448.30.1366.7168.662%
87
elmishoSoft Support
6.73646082.80401.543.668%
50
ScofieldHard Support
3.633857620.1370.123.873%

Head to headPast matches

Previous matches

LGD Gaming

PlayTime

Info

Check LGD Gaming vs PlayTime full Dota 2 match result & analysis from The International 2026: South America Closed Qualifier, played as a BO3 series with LGD Gaming winning 2 : 1. Dive into game-by-game statistics: game scores, team net worth values, GPM/XPM leaders, kill/death/assist (K/D/A) ratios, and hero performances for players like Yuma, TaiLung, Wisper, Thiolicor, KJ, Wits, Darkmago, Frank, elmisho, Scofield.

Analyze objective control, tower damage, Roshan influence, item builds and draft phases — which heroes were picked, banned, and which gave map control. Compare performance trends like kill participation rate, farm efficiency (LH/DN), gold per minute and experience per minute to see how LGD Gaming responded under pressure and where PlayTime outperformed them.

Use head-to-head (H2H) past results, team vs team history, and recent form to contextualize the result and understand momentum going forward in the tournament. Ideal for fans, analysts, and bettors seeking match analytics, meta insights, hero trends, and post-match breakdowns. Find replay links, match timeline visuals, and filter by game, player, and date to explore details.