European Pro League 38
T3
BO3

Do you know who will win next?

Player comparisonbased on the match

PlayerHero healing / minKill participation
39
WorickMid Lane
14.36729308.70.4926.8083%
46
MikSa`Off Lane
4.15185795.90.2264184.155%
50
dream`Off Lane
7.879088012.50.5664.7058%
72
MoOzSoft Support
5.93795512.30232.770.572%
50
dEsireHard Support
5.23675201.40383.371.772%
G-Time
Average
PlayerHero healing / minKill participation
26
bashkaSafe Lane
10.577085315.70.3587.2072%
50
Moonlight (UA player)Mid Lane
2.95045617.60.2505.1081%
50
CloudOff Lane
1.84875778.40.1440.794.856%
22
0000.Soft Support
1.63504452.70245.8105.165%
34
sailynSoft Support
1.52803470.90.116985.199%

Head to headPast matches

Previous matches

Zero Tenacity

G-Time

Info

Check Zero Tenacity vs G-Time full Dota 2 match result & analysis from European Pro League 38, played as a BO3 series with Zero Tenacity winning 2 : 0. Dive into game-by-game statistics: game scores, team net worth values, GPM/XPM leaders, kill/death/assist (K/D/A) ratios, and hero performances for players like Worick, dream](/dota2/players/16785), [MikSa, MoOz, dEsire, bashka, Moonlight (UA player), Cloud, sailyn, 0000..

Analyze objective control, tower damage, Roshan influence, item builds and draft phases — which heroes were picked, banned, and which gave map control. Compare performance trends like kill participation rate, farm efficiency (LH/DN), gold per minute and experience per minute to see how Zero Tenacity responded under pressure and where G-Time outperformed them.

Use head-to-head (H2H) past results, team vs team history, and recent form to contextualize the result and understand momentum going forward in the tournament. Ideal for fans, analysts, and bettors seeking match analytics, meta insights, hero trends, and post-match breakdowns. Find replay links, match timeline visuals, and filter by game, player, and date to explore details.