EPL Masters III
T3
BO3

Do you know who will win next?

Player comparisonbased on the match

CyberHero
Average
PlayerHero healing / minKill participation
47
WoESafe Lane
7.67418869.80.2755.8060%
41
AinkradMid Lane
6.16311,03080.21,058.8071%
48
bb3pxOff Lane
5.759573370.6650.7755%
38
sematarySoft Support
6.840366120.1575.820.763%
47
HtrdHard Support
3.635357310.2443.2158.162%
PlayerHero healing / minKill participation
34
nesfeerSafe Lane
2.663578411.60.2457.3039%
42
eraseMid Lane
2.74926286.70.3692.6077%
42
NefritOff Lane
2.15256867.90.3533.852.260%
36
Till the endHard Support
1.92753550.50357.246.171%

Head to headPast matches

Previous matches

CyberHero

Zero Tenacity

Info

Check CyberHero vs Zero Tenacity full Dota 2 match result & analysis from EPL Masters III, played as a BO3 series with CyberHero winning 2 : 0. Dive into game-by-game statistics: game scores, team net worth values, GPM/XPM leaders, kill/death/assist (K/D/A) ratios, and hero performances for players like WoE, Ainkrad, bb3px, sematary, Htrd, nesfeer, erase, Nefrit, raregods, Till the end.

Analyze objective control, tower damage, Roshan influence, item builds and draft phases — which heroes were picked, banned, and which gave map control. Compare performance trends like kill participation rate, farm efficiency (LH/DN), gold per minute and experience per minute to see how CyberHero responded under pressure and where Zero Tenacity outperformed them.

Use head-to-head (H2H) past results, team vs team history, and recent form to contextualize the result and understand momentum going forward in the tournament. Ideal for fans, analysts, and bettors seeking match analytics, meta insights, hero trends, and post-match breakdowns. Find replay links, match timeline visuals, and filter by game, player, and date to explore details.