EPL Masters II: Play-In
T3
BO3

Do you know who will win next?

Player comparisonbased on the match

FTS
Average
PlayerHero healing / minKill participation
31
cutieSafe Lane
8.586695414.50.4686.7065%
40
eraseMid Lane
13.867195810.20.3667.4069%
48
elmo^^Off Lane
9.872993610.80.1522.41.480%
24
monodramaHard Support
4.73925971.10.2353.911.669%
PlayerHero healing / minKill participation
50
nattynarwhal_Mid Lane
35417158.20.4614.9072%
34
young GMid Lane
2.374687813.40.5688.151.154%
29
a\redOff Lane
3.959176910.40.2328.162.558%
33
CovisnineSoft Support
1.52823481.90.1225.91.468%
34
arielHard Support
1.62604210.40.1230.6068%

Head to headPast matches

Previous matches

FTS

Nemiga Gaming

Info

Check FTS vs Nemiga Gaming full Dota 2 match result & analysis from EPL Masters II: Play-In, played as a BO3 series with FTS winning 2 : 0. Dive into game-by-game statistics: game scores, team net worth values, GPM/XPM leaders, kill/death/assist (K/D/A) ratios, and hero performances for players like cutie, Katsura, elmo^^, raregods, monodrama, byun, young G, Covisnine, ariel, hotoke.

Analyze objective control, tower damage, Roshan influence, item builds and draft phases — which heroes were picked, banned, and which gave map control. Compare performance trends like kill participation rate, farm efficiency (LH/DN), gold per minute and experience per minute to see how FTS responded under pressure and where Nemiga Gaming outperformed them.

Use head-to-head (H2H) past results, team vs team history, and recent form to contextualize the result and understand momentum going forward in the tournament. Ideal for fans, analysts, and bettors seeking match analytics, meta insights, hero trends, and post-match breakdowns. Find replay links, match timeline visuals, and filter by game, player, and date to explore details.