Games of the Future 2026
T2
BO3

Do you know who will win next?

Player comparisonbased on the match

PlayerHero healing / minKill participation
34
nesfeerSafe Lane
1.654554510.90.3371.7046%
46
WorickMid Lane
2.84505107.80.2534060%
44
MikSa`Off Lane
0.943243370.3306.311.440%
77
MoOzSoft Support
1.32463801.20251.61.979%
40
mrlsSoft Support
1.13053372.50375.6074%
LGD Gaming
Average
PlayerHero healing / minKill participation
74
YumaSafe Lane
17.578895712.60.2771.1065%
75
TaiLungMid Lane
1575487911.70.1716.1304.973%
90
WisperOff Lane
11.1721750110600.7065%
72
ThiolicorSoft Support
3.63424720.90.1371.5074%
75
KJHard Support
123364541.70.1305.6101.672%

Head to headPast matches

Previous matches

Zero Tenacity

LGD Gaming

Info

Check Zero Tenacity vs LGD Gaming full Dota 2 match result & analysis from Games of the Future 2026, played as a BO3 series with LGD Gaming winning 2 : 0. Dive into game-by-game statistics: game scores, team net worth values, GPM/XPM leaders, kill/death/assist (K/D/A) ratios, and hero performances for players like nesfeer, Worick, MikSa`, MoOz, mrls, Yuma, TaiLung, Wisper, Thiolicor, KJ.

Analyze objective control, tower damage, Roshan influence, item builds and draft phases — which heroes were picked, banned, and which gave map control. Compare performance trends like kill participation rate, farm efficiency (LH/DN), gold per minute and experience per minute to see how Zero Tenacity responded under pressure and where LGD Gaming outperformed them.

Use head-to-head (H2H) past results, team vs team history, and recent form to contextualize the result and understand momentum going forward in the tournament. Ideal for fans, analysts, and bettors seeking match analytics, meta insights, hero trends, and post-match breakdowns. Find replay links, match timeline visuals, and filter by game, player, and date to explore details.